Thursday, January 2, 2014

Women's History Class Paper 2


 Paper #2.

(and... I'm still learning how to do this type of paper.) 


Taylor Speer-Sims

Women's History Class 
University of Nebraska-Kearney
December 11, 2013



There are many similarities between the numerous works of the required readings and those that were personal choices. Gender and femininity held positions of power and subordination. Seen through a man’s view, which created the ideal feminine women. Women’s bodies have been symbols used for, and sanctioned by, the government and marketing purposes. Homemakers, mothers, and sexual objects were typical roles. Some may say otherwise, but many women held power by cementing their femininity in the real world. In each piece presented women were active participants who helped to create American history.
Pin-ups were used as propaganda ploys, argued Dr. Robert B Westbrook in his work "'I Want a Girl, Just Like the Girl that Married Harry James': American Women and the Problem of Political Obligation in World War II." Westbrook discussed the idea that a liberal state protects citizens’ natural rights, but also asks for political obligations, which were not just private but also social by race and/or gender. Westbrook argued pin-ups were individual demonstrations of traditional sexual and racial roles. Sanctioned by the state and revered by both men and women, pin-ups were not just masturbatory objects, but were the idealization of home. Misogynistic themes throughout the paper indicated that women’s reality was to germinate men’s illusions. In fact, it was her duty to give American men something worth fighting for, and according to Westbrook, the “women themselves participated in the mobilization.”[1]
Westbrook has an extensive background and experience to prove his argument. He has a B.A. from Yale University with distinctions in history. His Ph.D. in history is from Stanford University and teaches multiple history courses at the University of Rochester. He has authored many other related books and articles.[2] Even though his paper was a joy to read, his bias short sighted his proof. Westbrook wrote a contradiction to his argument within his notes where he stated

I do not mean to imply here that Betty Grable served in any direct way as a motivation for combat… studies of men in combat have shown, most soldiers were motivated to fight less by ideology than by such consideration as loyalty to their buddies… and sheer survival.”[3]

Joan W. Scott’s perspective in “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis” was not on men, but “gender as a tool of analysis.”[4] Scott argued gender should be its own category of analysis, and when reexamined, women’s history will redefine and enlarge “traditional notions of historical significance, to encompass personal, subjective experience as well as public and political activities.”[5]  Scott’s historiography said that gender constructs have different theories and may or may not be fixed according to society. Scott related gender constructs, including sexuality and reproduction, to power inequality. She also said that society and politics constructed gender, and the reverse was also true: “Gender is [the] constitutive element of social relationships… and is the primary way of signifying relationships of power.”[6]
Scott’s credentials and argument in gender, society, and politics has a complete and sound platform. Scott is world renown, a multiple award winner, and historian. She specializes in feminist history, gender theory, and power. She is also interested in the “relation between discourse and experience, and the role and practice of historians.”[7] Scott found fault with Marxist feminism, psychoanalytical theory, and patriarchy, yet she still included positives and negatives, which gave a complete, yet enlightened, argument.
Preferring Capitalism to Communism is one focus of Elaine Tyler May’s argument in Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. May’s main theme was the connection of familial status, the father as the breadwinner, the mother as home keeper and mother, with the idea of national security within the Cold War era. If any of these family members were week, then the strength of America was insecure and vulnerable to homosexuality and Communism (i.e. Red Scare, Lavender Scare, and “Momism.”) May’s work used a combination of thematic and chronological methods. May presented the idea that the 1950’s were unusual in U.S. history. Women’s position had regressed from the higher paying positions they had during the war, to the social idea of housewives being the pinnacle of their goals. Women’s happiness and self worth were based upon their domestic consumerism, and how clean their house was. May said, “experts called upon women to embrace domesticity in service to the nation.”[8] Women who did not follow this manuscript were considered masculine, according to May, just as Gerda Lerner and Jean H. Baker noted.[9]
May has an extensive background in gender, sexuality, domestic culture and politics with issues that intersect with consumerism and the Cold War era. Her Ph.D. is in United States History, from the University of California, Los Angeles. She is a well-respected professor at University of Minnesota. She has many publications on modern women’s history.[10] The only negative was that she included only the white middle-class, but May wrote in a way that made her book on gender in the Cold War era easy to read.
Chana Kai Lee wrote about Hamer’s growth from poverty to civil rights activist, and a story of race, gender, and violence. Hamer, was discriminated based on an “interlocking nature of oppression” and had been an outsider in every group that she was in.[11] As Scott wrote on the relationship of power and gender, Hamer was influenced by more than just her gender. Power and politics were relational with all demographics and subcultures in respects to domination and subordination.[12] Lee said “Hamer drew strength and inspiration from poverty and racism and went on to become one of the most respected leaders of her day.”[13] Unlike May’s idea of womanhood, Hamer was a strong workingwoman who was not a white middle-class, stay at home, motherly, domestic goddess. Lee’s view on Hamer was that even though she was abused and mistreated, she refused to be dismissed, similar to Truth.
Chana Kai Lee received several awards for her chronologically organized book. The work won the Willie Lee Rose Prize by the Southern Association of Women Historians and the Letitia Woods Brown Memorial Book Prize by the Association of Black Women Historians. She has a Ph.D. from UCLA, and is an Associate Professor of History and Women’s Studies at the University of Georgia. Her research and teaching interests include African American, gender & sexuality, United States 19th and 20th centuries, and women’s histories.[14] Lee’s biography on Hamer has become the “definitive biography of one of the most important civil rights activists of the twentieth century.”[15]
Women’s activism has been around for quite a while, and so Sara M. Evans broke down and period-ized these participation movements into “waves.” While sectioning made it easy to study, it also described the ebb and flow of the movement within American society. She argued that “the brilliant creativity and longevity of feminism in the late twentieth century is grounded in the breathtaking claim that personal is political.”[16] Westbrook emphasized the idea that politics were personal, and Evans indicated that the second wave was more “personal is political.”[17] This argument was shown through Evan’s thematic system of interpretation and dissection of events. So, even with the long twentieth century, Evans argued that the women of the second wave did not look at the past; they believed themselves to be the first women to march and fight for equal rights. Therefore, they did not build upon the experience of the first wave, but instead found themselves going in circles and fighting amongst the ranks.
Evans specializes in Twentieth Century Women’s Studies, Gender Analysis, Family History, American Women’s History, and Social History. She has won numerous awards and is a distinguished university professor at the University of Minnesota.[18] Evans has been an influential historian on women throughout the United States, as well as at U. of M. She assisted in the creation of the Women’s History and Feminist Studies there. She donated thousands of research documents and recordings to the university on her retirement.[19]
In the book From Out of the Shadows: Mexican Women in Twentieth-Century America by Vicki L. Ruiz, women of Hispanic ancestry were brought “out of the shadows” by utilizing oral history as the main source of research and by claiming public space. She said “the power of telling stories long ignored or silenced… persists despite a spate of award-winning books and essays over the past twenty years.”[20] Ruiz argued that Hispanic women have made history while they fought against deportation, repatriation, violence, poverty, and discrimination.  Latina activists have made differences for themselves and of their male counterparts. Mexican American women took the lead for their families, and still were “agents of change.” Ruiz maintained that the paradigm of separate spheres did not work with Hispanics; these women did everything.
Vicki L. Ruiz is a Hispanic writer, Dean of the School of Humanities, and a professor of history and Chicano/Latino Studies at the University of California, Irvine. Ruiz has been a member of many academic organizations and book wards.[21] Oral history is a consistent  source of research for her as she said that the history at home did not match the history at school.[22] She wrote this work in chronological order within each topic of her thematic structure. Ruiz was instrumental in bringing Latina history into the light, instead of being ignored or forgotten in immigration and Women’s History in a very interesting and compelling manner.
“The ‘Crisis’ Cover Girl: Lena Horne, the NAACP, and Representations of African American Femininity, 1941-1945” by Megan E. Williams brought the complexity of minority women as cover girls into focus. Williams’ argument was that the femininity of African American women in the war years was based upon the marketing strategy of magazines, which used light-skinned women as their ideal. Williams primarily based her work on the Crisis, which was one of the largest selling African American magazines during this period. This magazine portrayed woman as “inactive glamour girls,” and used skin color “as an indicator of middle-class status among African Americans.”[23]  Williams said that magazines preferred

headshots of well-dressed, light-skinned African American women who were college-educated ladies, beauty-contest winners, soldiers’ wives, or celebrated entertainers, over photographs of dark-skinned women engaged in war-production work.[24]

This seems in line with Westbrook’s argument, and had the argument of the triple discrimination factor of Hamer and the Hispanic women. Williams agreed that white women as pin-ups were used to show white idealism, just as Westbrook noted. She went on to say that unlike the white counterpart, the black pin-up was used to show “victory over racism,” which was part of “victory over fascism.”[25]
Pin-ups and cover girls in this paper idealized femininity, yet the organization and title are somewhat off because Horne was only a section of the paper. The paper was written chronologically and gave a great deal of information on the Crisis and perceptions of African American femininity. Horne’s attributes fit in perfectly with the ideal of black femininity with the exception that she was strong enough to be able to push back against the idea of her being NAACP and the “Crisis” ideal by saying “all right, I’m a symbol. But I’m a person too.”[26] Perhaps one of the reasons that there was less information on Lena Horne than the title indicates is that Megan Williams wrote her Ph.D. dissertation on this lady at the University of Kansas, where she has also taught Women’s and American Studies.[27]  It was certainly an interesting read, but Williams could have written more on Lena Horne, the singer, film actress, and activist to make her title more accurate.
Caroline Brown wrote on two movies representing feminine and minority characterization themes in her paper, “The Representation of the Indigenous Other in ‘Daughters of the Dust’ and ‘The Piano.”  Brown mentioned that there were similarities and differences within these two woman produced films. Brown’s argument was that both films used the traditional female subordination and ethnocentric ideologies in an “unconventional narrative.”[28] Brown’s idea of racial and sexual positioning “are translated in terms of those who are typically identified as the possessors of power, whites and men, usually white men,” just as argued in Lee and Ruiz.[29] Brown ‘s piece on racial and gender vulnerability, brought up “rebellious femininity of a lone white woman in a hostile, misogynistic, and alienating foreign culture,” which is the same as in Ruiz, with Hispanic women in a white world.[30] Brown argued that the natives within both films were feminized as they were placed in sexualized subordinate positions. In Daughters of the Dust, the native was unable to speak and had long flowing hair. Brown argued that in the Piano, the natives could speak, but were childlike and placed in the background, similar to where Ruiz said the Latinas were placed in history.
Caroline Brown is an Assistant Professor in English at the University of Massachusetts Boston. She specializes in Women’s Studies and twentieth-century American literature and African Diaspora.[31] Brown’s work has been featured in many university feminist profiles and quoted in feminist websites. While not a history professor, she has still made an impact on Women’s History. This was provoking and a great comparative piece within her study.
The piece from Janell Hobson, “Viewing in the Dark: Toward a Black Feminist Approach to Film” introduced more than just the otherness of Brown’s piece. Hobson brought out more than physicality in this work. She went further than Williams by saying that black women’s bodies in film may hold the “Jezebel or tragic mulatto, but there is also displeasure in such cases as grotesque mammies and Sapphires.”[32] Hobson agreed with Brown and Ruiz by saying that black women were usually in the background. She agreed with Westbrook and Williams that female characters in film are there for the pleasure of men, if they were seen at all. Hobson went on to say, “black female voice as the singers [in movies may] provide the emotional and ‘soulful’ track of the narrative of the white male protagonist in search of his soul.”[33] Because the singers weren’t seen, it

Further implies how the black woman’s [non] presence ensures the identity of white masculinity. Her invisible blackness signifies in polarity with his visible whiteness… as his racial and sexual ‘other.’ She symbolizes what is most foreign to him… Such contrast further reflects his internal struggles and the contradictions of his hegemonic status.

Janell Hobson stylizes herself as “scholar, writer, educator, and critic.”[34] She is an Associate Professor of Women’s Studies at the University at Albany, State University of New York. Hobson, and has a Ph.D. in Women’s Studies from Emory University. She has authored two books and many articles on racism and gender. Her thematic film piece is fantastic and this author highly recommends it.
Ann Kaplan wrote not just on women seen or heard in film, but also on women working on the films, and included discussion on college courses of study on her subject. Kaplan’s point that film was a heavily male dominated field correlated with the two previous authors, as well as the idea that the portrayal of women was “probably a result of traditional sex-role typing.”[35] Kaplan went further by saying that the relationship of film and women varied “from period to period, and depends on the style [of the] director.”[36] Kaplan told her audience that studying films is necessary and should be pursued, similar to Scott’s argument. She agreed with May that women’s traditional role has been in the home setting. Women in film have been consistently viewed through male eyes wrote Kaplan, just as many of the above authors.
Coming from a different field, the British Film Institute, Dr. Ann Kaplan came from is an Assistant Professor at the University College of Rutgers University. She teaches women and film, and was the initiator and developer of the program there. She has also written other articles on the subject as well as a book entitled Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. Her paper was somewhat choppy, but gave a good message, and showed a thorough knowledge of the subject.
The message of “Sex as a Weapon: Feminist Rock Music Videos” was not so obvious a title for the next article. Robin Roberts used the title of Pat Benatar’s song “Sex as a Weapon” within her own title possibly for recognition by the reader. It was understandable, but only after reading the entire paper (or perhaps a Pat Benatar fanatic might have known?). The document was more about how women artists used their sexuality for their own benefit and power. This was different than the film authors noted. However, there was certainly some agreement with Westbrook and minimally by Brown. Roberts went further by saying that this art form was a complex interaction of the artist with the viewer, whether man or woman. Roberts gave three female performers (Tina Turner, Janet Jackson and Pat Benatar) as examples, but her thought provoking discourse brought to mind others within the same context, such as TLC, Madonna, and Lady Gaga.
Roberts is Dean of Fulbright College in Fayetteville, Arkansas. She was previously at Louisiana State University where she taught English and Women’s and Gender Studies. She has authored five books, “dozens of articles and more than seventy-five papers.”[37] Ratemyprofessor.com rated her at an average of 3.6, where one student said that she “knows her stuff.”[38]  This was evident in Robert’s document, although it was completely biased and should have included some opposing videos.
The papers and books presented have all included many of the same aspects. Many of the authors spoke of

femininity and its position with power and subordination. Portraits of women through photographs and

movies have been seen through men’s eyes and arguably through women’s as well. The typical portrayal of

women was usually the ideal of being a housewife, mother, and sex symbol. Some women have taken their

power back to create themselves. Women were not just idol objects, but were participatory in their

representation and in history.


Bibliography

Baker, Jean H. Sisters: The Lives of America’s Suffragists. New York: Hill and Wang, 2005.

Brown, Caroline “The Representation of the Indigenous Other in ‘Daughters of the Dust’ and
‘The Piano.”  The Johns Hopkins University Press, as quoted in NWSA Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1 2003. in JSTOR (accessed December 12, 2013).

Eng 7201, “Robin Roberts” 2006. http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/Show
Ratings.jsp?tid=563208 (accessed December 12, 2013)

“Evans, Sara M.” College of Liberal Arts, quoted in “Department of History,” University of
Minnesota, 2013. http://www.hist.umn.edu/people/profile.php?UID=s-evan (accessed December 12, 2013)

Evans, Sara M. Tidal Wave: How Women Changed America at Century’s End. New York:
Free Press, 2003.

Franklin College of Arts & Sciences, Department of History,  “Chana Kai Lee” quoted in
“People” The University of Georgia. n.d. http://history.uga.edu/people/people.php?page=19 (accessed December 12, 2013).

Gaber, Sharon and Steve Voorhies. “Roberts Named Dean of Fulbright College,” University
of Arkansas Newswire, 2011. http://newswire.uark.edu/articles/15882/roberts-named-dean-of-fulbright-college (accessed December 12, 2013)

Hobson, Janell. “C.V.” JanellHobson.com . N.d. (accessed December 12, 2013)

---- “Viewing in the Dark: Toward a Black Feminist Approach to Film,” The
Feminist Press at the City University of New York, as quoted in Women’s Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. ½, Looking Across the Lens: Women’s Studies and Film Spring – Summer, 2002. in JSTOR. (accessed December 12, 2013).

Kaplan, Ann “The Feminist Perspective in Film Studies,” University of Illinois Press,
Journal of the University Film Association, Vol. 26, No. ½, Women in Film, 1974, in JSTOR. 2013. (accessed December 12, 2013)

Lee, Chana Kai. For Freedom’s Sake: The Life of Fannie Lou Hamer. Urbana: University of
Illinois Press, 1999.

Lerner, Gerda. The Grimke’ Sisters From South Carolina: Pioneers for Woman’s Rights and
Abolition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

“May, Elaine T.” College of Liberal Arts quoted in “American Studies,” University of
Minnesota, 2012.http://americanstudies.umn.edu/people/
profile.php?UID=mayxx002 (accessed December 12, 2013)

May, Elaine Tyler. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era,  New York:
Perseus Books Group, 2008.

 Painter, Nell Irvin Sojourner Truth: A Life, A Symbol. New York: W. W. Norton & C
Company, 1997.


Scott, Joan W. "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis," The American Historical
Review 91:5 December 1986. http://blackboard.unk.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-1760164-dt-content-rid-5814548_2/courses/2013FHIST84806/Joan%20Scott%20article.pdf (accessed December 11, 2013)

School of Humanities, “Vicki Lynn Ruiz: Faculty Profile,” University of California, Irvine.
2007. http://www.faculty.uci.edu//profile.cfm?faculty_id=5302 (accessed December 12, 2013)

Sussman, Sarah. “Joan W. Scott” (Stanford, Stanford University Libraries, 2007.
http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/scott/ (accessed December 11, 2013)

Van Ingen, Linda. “Introduction” in “Module 9 & Paper #1: Women in World War II.” In
Blackboard for class. http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/
frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013)

---- “Introduction” in “Module 11: Women in Civil Rights Movement.” In Blackboard for
class. http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_
group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013)

---- “Introduction: Sara M. Evans, Tidal Wave: How Women Changed
America at Century’s End. 2003.” Quoted in “Module 12: Feminist Movement,” in Blackboard for class. 2013. http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013)

---- “Module 13: Vicki Ruiz, From Out of the Shadows,” quoted in “Module 13: Mexican
American Women,” in Blackboard for class. 2013. http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013).

Westbrook, Robert B. "'I Want a Girl, Just Like the Girl that Married Harry James':
American Women and the Problem of Political Obligation in World War II," American Quarterly 42:4 December 1990. http://blackboard.unk.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-1760164-dt-content-rid-5814549_2/courses/2013FHIST84806/Westbrook%20article.pdf (accessed December 11, 2013)

---- “CV,” New York: University of Rochester, 2013.
http://www.rochester.edu/College/HIS/faculty/westbrook_robert/assets/pdf/westbrook_cv.pdf (accessed December 11, 2013)

Williams, Megan E.  “Biography” Meganwilliams.com. 2012. accessed December 12, 2013.



[1] Robert B. Westbrook, "'I Want a Girl, Just Like the Girl that Married Harry James': American Women and the Problem of Political Obligation in World War II," American Quarterly 42:4 (December 1990), 587-614. http://blackboard.unk.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-1760164-dt-content-rid-5814549_2/courses/2013FHIST84806/Westbrook%20article.pdf (accessed December 11, 2013)

[2] Robert B. Westbrook, “CV,” (New York: University of Rochester, 2013) http://www.rochester.edu/College/HIS/faculty/westbrook_robert/assets/pdf/westbrook_cv.pdf (accessed December 11, 2013)
[3] Ibid.

[4] Linda Van Ingen, “Introduction” in “Module 9 & Paper #1: Women in World War II.” In Blackboard for class. http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_
group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013)

[5] Joan W. Scott, "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis," The American Historical Review 91:5 (December 1986), 1053-1075. http://blackboard.unk.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-1760164-dt-content-rid-5814548_2/courses/2013FHIST84806/Joan%20Scott%20article.pdf (accessed December 11, 2013)

[6] Ibid.

[7] Sarah Sussman, “Joan W. Scott” (Stanford, Stanford University Libraries, 2007.) http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/scott/ (accessed December 11, 2013)

[8] Elaine Tyler May, Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era, ( New York: Perseus Books Group, 2008)

[9] Gerda Lerner, The Grimke’ Sisters From South Carolina: Pioneers for Woman’s Rights and Abolition. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 110.; Jean H. Baker, Sisters: The Lives of America’s Suffragists. (New York: Hill and Wang, 2005), 75.

[10] College of Liberal Arts, “Elaine T. May,” quoted in “American Studies,” University of Minnesota (2012) http://americanstudies.umn.edu/people/profile.php?UID=mayxx002 (accessed December 12, 2013)

[11] Linda Van Ingen, “Introduction” in “Module 11: Women in Civil Rights Movement.” In Blackboard for class. http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_
group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013)

[12] Chana Kai Lee, For Freedom’s Sake: The Life of Fannie Lou Hamer. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.),

[13] Ibid, ix.

[14] Franklin College of Arts & Sciences, Department of History,  “Chana Kai Lee” quoted in “People” The University of Georgia. (n.d.) http://history.uga.edu/people/people.php?page=19 (accessed December 12, 2013).

[15] Lee, back cover.

[16] Westbrook; Sara M. Evans, Tidal Wave: How Women Changed America at Century’s End. (New York: Free Press, 2003), 4.

[17] Ibid.

[18] College of Liberal Arts, “Sara M. Evans,” quoted in “Department of History,” University of Minnesota, (2013.) http://www.hist.umn.edu/people/profile.php?UID=s-evan (accessed December 12, 2013)

[19] Linda Van Ingen, “Introduction: Sara M. Evans, Tidal Wave: How Women Changed America at Century’s End. (2003).” Quoted in “Module 12: Feminist Movement,” in Blackboard for class. (2013)http://blackboard.unk.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_90613_1%26url%3D (accessed December 12, 2013)

[20] Vicki L. Ruiz, From Out of the Shadows: Mexican Women in Twentieth-Century America: Tenth Anniversary Ed. Kindle Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Afterward.

[21] “Faculty Profile,” University of California, Irvine. (2007) ttp://www.faculty.uci.edu//profile.cfm?faculty_id=5302 (accessed December 12, 2013)

[22] From Out of the Shadows, xii-xiv.

[23] Megan E. Williams, “The ‘Crisis’ Cover Girl: Lena Horne, the NAACP, and Representations of African American Femininity, 1941-1945,” Ohio State University Press as quoted in American Periodicals, Vol. 16, No. 2, (2006), 200-218. in JSTOR. (2013) (accessed December 12, 2013).

[24] Ibid.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Lena Horne in Ibid.

[27] Megan E. Williams, “Biography” Meganewilliams.com (2012) (accessed December 12, 2013)

[28] Caroline Brown “The Representation of the Indigenous Other in ‘Daughters of the Dust’ and ‘The Piano.”  The Johns Hopkins University Press, as quoted in NWSA Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2003), 1-19.in JSTOR (accessed December 12, 2013).

[29] Ibid.

[30] Ibid.

[31] Ibid.

[32] Janell Hobson, “Viewing in the Dark: Toward a Black Feminist Approach to Film,” The Feminist Press at the City University of New York, as quoted in Women’s Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. ½, Looking Across the Lens: Women’s Studies and Film (Spring – Summer, 2002), 45-59. in JSTOR. (accessed December 12, 2013).

[33] Ibid.

[34] Janell Hobson, “C.V.” JanellHobson.com . N.d. (accessed December 12, 2013)

[35] Ann Kaplan, “The Feminist Perspective in Film Studies,” University of Illinois Press, Journal of the University Film Association, Vol. 26, No. ½, Women in Film, (1974), 5, 18-20, 22. in JSTOR. (2013), (accessed December 12, 2013)

[36] Ibid.
[37] Sharon Gaber and Steve Voorhies, “Roberts Named Dean of Fulbright College,” University of Arkansas Newswire, (2011) http://newswire.uark.edu/articles/15882/roberts-named-dean-of-fulbright-college (accessed December 12, 2013)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Great T-Shirts and More!


See other gifts available on Zazzle.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...